One of my favorite movies is Hot Fuzz, the story of an overzealous London policeman (Simon Pegg), who transfers to a small town where things are not as they seem. Throughout the movie, various characters declare that something is being done “for the greater good.” Watch the movie. I won’t play spoiler. After you watch, go to imdb.com and read more about all the subtleties you may have missed. Trust me on this one.
Anyway, this is the part of the blog post where I segue from a totally unrelated pop culture reference to something related to employment.
Today we’ll talk about volunteers — you know, those who perform work “for the greater good” (nailed it!).
Where is the line between volunteers and employees, and when must volunteers be paid?
The Department of Labor (DOL) is pretty tough when it comes to determining Who Is My Employee? As explained here, a worker not in business for himself/herself is usually presumed to be an employee under the Economic Realities Test.
The DOL, however, recognizes an exception for work that is truly volunteer work — so long as it’s not wink wink nod nod really employment.
What’s the difference?
Congress may finally provide some clarity in determining who is a joint employer. In legislation introduced last week, the House proposed a bill that would rewrite the definition of “joint employer” under federal labor law (National Labor Relations Act) and federal wage and hour law (Fair Labor Standards Act).

It’s summer intern hiring season. Can your interns be unpaid? If you pay them something, can you pay a small stipend that amounts to less than minimum wage?
Sort of. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) covers only employees, not independent contractors. The FLSA’s requirements on minimum wage and overtime, therefore, do not apply to independent contractors.
Let’s talk about good old-fashioned 